They promote the cult of the body and
本帖最後由 Hasina566 於 2024-1-18 16:33 編輯
But if we think a little deeper: what exactly do these programs represent? They are extremely superficial, they expose the miseries of others publicly, they deify people whose only merits are to cause scandal and attract attention, they promote a model of “success” for which it is not necessary to study or be moderately prepar or intelligent ,, in the process, perpetuate harmful beauty standards. In short, garbage is normaliz and legitimiz as a model of success. Of course, none of this is new or anything recent or from recent years.
It is something that has been done for decades, examples abound. And it is a direct consequence of a transversal and systematic ucational lack, which has creat generations of people accustom to Middle East Mobile Number List reflecting little. effort is seen as unprofitable and boring. However, we must take into account Hernán Migoya's reflections on perceptions of culture, following the reaction of some virtual groups against these programs ( in favor-of-trash-TV-and-against-authoritarianism-in-culture. Many people believe that culture should be serious, stuffy, distant.
For this reason, I transcribe his position literally: “[..] There is nothing bad or sinful about culture being entertaining, on the contrary, it is an add value: almost the only value that should be mandatory.” Furthermore, he adds: “Culture should not be boring, solemn, indoctrinating and “innocuous” to the minds of consumers.” And I conclude with his open affront against those who dictate what is culture or not: “[...] they come from the most fanatical and conservative segments of society, those who deep down consider living culture as a threat against society. |